"testimony" in inglés with examples - Collocation dictionary inglés

testimony sustantivo

sustantivo + testimony

Kolokacji: 17

jury testimony • eyewitness testimony • court testimony • expert testimony • trial testimony • testimony of witnesses • ...

testimony + verbo

Kolokacji: 40

testimony comes • testimony shows • testimony indicates • testimony helps • testimony begins • ...

verbo + testimony

Kolokacji: 44

give testimony • hear testimony • provide testimony • take testimony • offer testimony • present testimony • include testimony • ...

adjetivo + testimony

Kolokacji: 77

Congressional testimony • false testimony • grand jury testimony • early testimony • public testimony • ...

colocaciones frecuentes

Kolokacji: 10

collocations grouped by meanings

Grup znaczeniowych: 20

(1) Congressional, detailed, dramatic, additional, extensive, ...

Kolokacji: 10

1. Congressional testimony = Kongresu zeznanie Congressional testimony

congressional testimony

2. detailed testimony = szczegółowe zeznanie detailed testimony

3. dramatic testimony = teatralne zeznanie dramatic testimony

4. additional testimony = dodatkowe zeznanie additional testimony

5. extensive testimony = rozległe zeznanie extensive testimony

6. ample testimony = dostateczne zeznanie ample testimony

7. uncorroborated testimony = niepotwierdzone zeznanie uncorroborated testimony

8. forensic testimony = sądowe zeznanie forensic testimony

9. immunized testimony = uodpornić zeznanie immunized testimony

The problem, the court held, was the possibility that witnesses against the defendant might have seen his immunized testimony on television and allowed it to taint their own trial testimony.
Mr. Walsh had gathered most of his evidence before Mr. North gave his immunized testimony.
Although McFarlane completed his grand jury testimony before North gave his immunized testimony, McFarlane was key Government witness at trial.
According to Judge Gesell's reasoning, the only way to allow the immunized testimony to be used at trial without infringing on the rights of the defendants is to try them separately.
If prosecutors can compel defendants to provide these kinds of evidence, they should also be allowed to introduce reliable evidence that is found as a result of earlier immunized testimony.
His conviction was later overturned on grounds that he did not receive a fair trial (the prosecution may have been influenced by his immunized testimony in front of Congress.)
His convictions were later overturned on the grounds that his immunized testimony had tainted his trial.
But each of the defendants has the right to use the immunized testimony of others in presenting his defense, and they have all said they would do so.
In the appeal, Mr. Walsh said the appeals court had erected obstacles "of unprecedented strictness to the prosecution of persons who have given public immunized testimony."
A year later, a Federal appeals court threw out the convictions because his immunized testimony had been improperly used against him.