blood accusation
blood libel

From that time to the end of the 19th century, several further blood accusations were brought against the Jews; these, however, never provoked any great excitement.

Ẓa'aḳat Damim, refutation of the blood accusation in Poland.

In 1877 Chwolson saw a new blood accusation brought against Jews at Kutais, Transcaucasia.

As the lord of Bösing (Pezinok) was in debt to the Jews, a blood accusation was brought against these creditors in 1529.

Péczely, a large man who had served twelve years in jail for murder, apparently connived with Recsky to make Móric the instrument of a classic blood accusation.

In Latin Cantarini wrote the Vindex Sanguinis, a reply to the work on blood accusation of Jacob Geuze (Amsterdam, 1681).

The Berlin institute has published Strack's "Introduction to the Talmud," his editions of some tractates of the Mishnah, and a monograph on the blood accusation.

Utz, Richard: Remembering Ritual Murder: The Anti-Semitic Blood Accusation Narrative in Medieval and Contemporary Cultural Memory.

In consequence of the Damascus affair in 1840, Chorin republished the apology written in 1753 by Sonnenfels, in which the author proves the falsity of the blood accusation.

Blood libel (also blood accusation) is an accusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered the children of Christians to use their blood as part of their religious rituals during Jewish holidays.

In retaliation he published a pamphlet on Simon of Trent, in an effort to confirm the truth of the blood accusation (Ein Ritualmord Actenmässig Nachgewiesen, Vienna 1893).

The first blood accusation in Moldavia (and, as such, in Romania) was made in 1710, when the Jews of Târgu Neamț were charged with having killed a Christian child for ritual purposes.

Over thirty of Schaikewitz's plays have been produced, first in Russia, then in New York, among them being one entitled Tisza-Eslar, on the subject of the blood accusation brought in the Hungarian town of that name.

Sir Moses Montefiore, after aiding the Damascus Jews by obtaining, in an interview with the Sultan at Constantinople, a firman repudiating the blood accusation, visited Russia in 1846 to intercede for his coreligionists there.

At the time of the blood accusation at Damascus (1840) he was president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and was among the first to urge Sir Moses Montefiore's journey to the East.

In 1840, when the blood accusation was made at Damascus, he published a refutation of it in four languages (Hebrew, English, French, and German) and wrote a defense of Judaism against an anonymous writer in the London "Times."

According to Prof. David Ruderman, chairman of the Judaica Studies Program at Yale University, the Trial of the Jews at Trent "is the most important blood accusation in Italy and one of the most documented murder trials of the Middle Ages."

As early as 1840, when the blood accusation was revived with regard to the Damascus affair, and Jewish matters were for the first time treated on an international basis, the Jews of England took by far the most prominent position in the general protest of the European Jewries against the charge.

Can we at least agree to put the blood libel stories to rest, once and for all?

He organized an information service and a campaign against blood libels.

Blood libel wasn't the only religious reference in the video.

The tale is related to various blood libel stories common at the time.

The blood libel is central to the history of anti-Semitism.

Six blood libels have been recorded as having taken place in Georgia.

This blood libel become a part of English literary tradition.

This was the first medieval example of blood libel against Jews.

The accused were found not guilty, but the blood libels continued.

There never was any evidence for the blood libel.

But under its polished surface the book is in fact a sophisticated blood libel.

It led to blood libel against the Jews, putting some of them in jail while others were killed.

On the other hand, a group called jewsforsarah.com declared that "the use of the term blood libel is appropriate."

It's the kind of blood libel that in another era was spread about Jews.

This is an explicit blood libel against the state.

In the 1860s, there was another riot motivated by blood libel accusations.

She's not sorry about using the historically loaded phrase "blood libel."

The blood libel has played a particularly nefarious role in the history of anti-Semitism.

That approach can backfire, as the "blood libel" incident clearly shows.

Allegations of blood libel spread during the Holocaust and still persist today.

The term "blood libel" has a very distinct history.

The legend of his death describes a ritual murder which has been described as a blood libel.

Nevertheless, instances of what has come to be known as the "blood libel" have persisted into modern times.

But then Palin decided to describe the attacks leveled against her as a "blood libel."

That the blood libel and the matzah of Zion stories are true.