FireWire

I've already been living without Firewire on my main machine for three years.

Later in its life, the company focused more on Firewire based products.

I think it's hard to describe Firewire as a failure.

Only about 100 Firewire devices, most of them video cameras, are available today.

Especially as i do not recall firewire ever being considered for networking.

If so, is this like a cleaner firewire on steroids?

For this reason, all Firewire networks currently only use one segment.

Give up the dream, people, because FireWire support is never coming back.

This might replace firewire, but highly unlikely to do much besides that.

I doubt it will be as successful as firewire, which is also pretty much dead at this point.

Was that not what basically sunk Firewire over time?

Apple are obviously blind to the fact that this is (approaching) the firewire problem all over again.

The situation is not unlike the one that plagued FireWire in its early days.

So, any device connected by FireWire can read and write data on the computer memory.

Many current FireWire controllers still only capture to one or the other type.

Others have argued that there is no space for the FireWire connector.

Now let's get back to the implementation of FireWire.

The old days of FireWire cameras were dominated by company specific solutions.

She walked over and attached the firewire cable.

If you have a camcorder with a firewire connection, you can bring in video that way.

On another subject, I always prefer FireWire even if it cost more.

Most computers include only one or two FireWire ports, though, so they can fill up fast.

The camera can be remotely tethered to a computer via a Firewire connection.

Often FireWire cameras are only a cog in a bigger system.

Many aspects of system integration are not directly related to FireWire cameras.