Additional examples are adjusted to the entries in an automated way - we cannot guarantee that they are correct.
But this is an identical proposition, and throws no light on the mode of my existence.
Two identical propositions followed, and were defeated, in 1877 and 1880.
First, All purely identical propositions.
I. As identical propositions.
How identical propositions are trifling.
But how that vindicates the making use of identical propositions, for the improvement of knowledge, from the imputation of trifling, I do not see.
Nor do these, or any such identical propositions help him one jot forwards in the skill of reading, let him make what use of them he can.
But that the I which thinks, must be considered as in thought always a subject, and as a thing which cannot be a predicate to thought, is an apodeictic and identical proposition.
The principle of reason and consequent, the necessity of thinking each given fact of perception as conditioned, impels understanding towards an endless series of identical propositions, the records of successive comparisons and abstractions.
I know there are some who, because identical propositions are self-evident, show a great concern for them, and think they do great service to philosophy by crying them up; as if in them was contained all knowledge, and the understanding were led into all truth by them only.
With a weak principle of translation (e.g., "a proposition in language A is the same as a semantically identical proposition in language B" [note that a proposition is not the same as a sentence]), we can now deduce that Pierre believes that London is pretty.