maladministration

The most important example being that of maladministration in high office.

Maladministration was proved in all but one of the cases.

It is a fact that most complaints concern cases of maladministration.

It is good news that, in more than half of the cases completed last year, there was found to be no maladministration.

A finding of no maladministration is not always negative for the citizen.

This report concerns a complaint of maladministration against the Commission.

Thus, it is unnecessary to consider the alternative ground of maladministration.

Whether maladministration has in fact occurred is a matter for the Commissioners to decide.

In 59 % of cases no maladministration was found to have occurred.

But the right to administer does not mean that the State cannot interfere in case of maladministration.

In contrast, my role is to help uncover maladministration and to attempt to put it right.

However, lack of responsible officials and maladministration has led this sport to decline as well.

That would do no harm, because I am sure the small number you deal with does not truly reflect the problems of maladministration.

Are there penalties for divisions or individuals involved in maladministration when it comes to citizens?

This is a highly political question and not just one of whether or not maladministration has been brought to light there.

In 45 % of the cases, the inquiry revealed no maladministration.

Even when maladministration is not found, I may identify opportunities to improve the quality of administration provided by the institutions.

The most common type of maladministration was lack of transparency.

There was opportunity for maladministration in terms of both efficiency and peculation.

His honesty was the deciding factor in those times of corruption and maladministration.

In 1693 he was charged with maladministration before the House of Commons.

Maladministration, corruption and failed projects have unfortunately been common.

The Commission receives a particularly high number of complaints from citizens concerning maladministration.

As Morris put it, "An election every four years will prevent maladministration."

How do we protect against a repeat of the maladministration of the trust fund?