Additional examples are adjusted to the entries in an automated way - we cannot guarantee that they are correct.
If both involve a gap, why settle for ontological monism?
Hence, AM is a form of predicate dualism which accompanies ontological monism.
Can the dispute between ontological monism and ontological pluralism be resolved, and how?
Kluge states that the Bahá'í teachings do not accept an ontological monism and that not all views can be correct.
In other words, the doctrine of the internality of relations together with the thesis of the independence of substance seems logically to lead to the position of ontological monism; conversely, the monist thesis seems necessarily to presuppose the thesis of the internality of relations.
It is trapped into what in The Essence of Manifestation Michel Henry calls "ontological monism"; it completely ignores the invisible interiority of life, its radical immanence and its original mode of revelation which is irreducible to any form of transcendence or to any exteriority.