Additional examples are adjusted to the entries in an automated way - we cannot guarantee that they are correct.
But if so, what makes the idea of a pluralistically structured world intelligible?
The world, it is argued, can in principle be described without using any "pluralistically committed" terms at all.
"We have a long history of tolerance, of living together pluralistically," he said.
In the former, decisions are private and pluralistically decentralized.
A fact, which continues to baffle the pluralistically challenged and puts him miles ahead of your average Canadian director.
He proposed a curriculum framework within which each state or school district could pluralistically vary constituent areas of study.
There is only one genuine subject - the whole - and the idea of a pluralistically structured world is an ontological misconception.
The Language Mavenhood is becoming less pluralistically ignorant.
Reflecting his strong religious beliefs as a lifelong Congregationalist, he gave away his entire estate to pay for student scholarships and professorships to divinity and religiously oriented schools that he considered "ecumenically and pluralistically minded."
The pluralist arguments, on the other hand, are designed to show that the possibility of such criteria is ensured by the existence of logically irreducible relations; or by the existence of irreducibly relational, and hence essentially "pluralistically committed", properties.
For the idea put forward is not merely that "pluralistically committed" relational properties are not as basic as qualitative properties, but that all properties and relations can in the end be assimilated to qualitative properties of one sort or another.
But now he goes into an all-out attack, arguing that whereas relational properties presuppose the existence of certain non-relational, or "qualitative", properties, the latter properties do not necessarily demand the existence of any "pluralistically committed" relational properties at all.
The first sees organizations pluralistically and, from a fairly orthodox political stance, asks what leads to conflicts in organizations that have to be settled politically, and what resources of power and influence different groups within organizations can draw upon to protect and advance their interests.