self-plagiarism

Students should make themselves aware of their department's rules on this "self-plagiarism".

In 2011, Frey was criticised for and admitted to self-plagiarism.

Take self-plagiarism, a well-documented failing among writers of all sizes.

Other forms of self-plagiarism are the subject of debate.

It does not make any reference to self-plagiarism.

But most inexcusable is his self-plagiarism, recycling between new covers tired stories he's told before.

Some academic journals have codes of ethics that specifically refer to self-plagiarism.

Even Gehry's self-plagiarism says more than he may intend.

Other organizations do not make specific reference to self-plagiarism:

In December 2015 one of the papers was retracted for "self-plagiarism", although the journal noted that the results remained valid.

Some might call your actions self-plagiarism, but the very premise of stealing your own creative property is absurd.

The concept of "self-plagiarism" has been challenged as being self-contradictory, an oxymoron, and on other grounds.

Samuelson describes misrepresentation as the basis of self-plagiarism.

B. F. Skinner describes his own experience of self-plagiarism:

Self-plagiarism is usually a consideration for critics, not feature writers; a textual weakness, not a matter of morals.

Bird identifies the ethical issues of "self-plagiarism" as those of "dual or redundant publication."

As Alfred Hitchcock once put it, "Self-plagiarism is style."

Talk about self-plagiarism.

Identifying self-plagiarism is often difficult because limited reuse of material is accepted both legally (as fair use) and ethically.

A thesis must present the student's own work, and all students are advised to read the College and University regulations on plagiarism (including self-plagiarism).

But what does the self-plagiarism of these one-song Swedes matter in the face of such expertly processed confections?

• Avoid "self-plagiarism" (duplicate publication) or "salami science" (slicing up one study's results into many publications).

The most common reasons for the retraction of articles are scientific misconduct including plagiarism, serious errors, and duplicate/concurrent publishing (self-plagiarism).

For example, Stephanie J. Bird argues that self-plagiarism is a misnomer, since by definition plagiarism concerns the use of others' material.

As David B. Resnik clarifies, "Self-plagiarism involves dishonesty but not intellectual theft."