Additional examples are adjusted to the entries in an automated way - we cannot guarantee that they are correct.
I've used all speech recognition programs over the last 10 years.
The problem with speech recognition: Who would want to talk to a computer?
But experts say true speech recognition is still several years away.
The speech recognition software held 4096 words, with only 64 available at a given time.
Perhaps the rise of computer speech recognition will change this.
And, see, here's the problem, is that we also have speech recognition.
Some speech recognition tasks are much more difficult than others.
If two people talk over the top of each other speech recognition is hopeless.
At least, that's what he would have written on one of the speech recognition tests.
If you're using speech recognition, you might want to reconsider.
We started with the basics of speech recognition technology, as you'll see on the next page.
One factor in the rise of speech recognition is that costs have come down.
In the office, however, speech recognition is years away, she said, because of technical restrictions.
These issues are likely to be worked out as natural speech recognition software advances.
Most companies say they use speech recognition to serve customers better, but some save money in the process.
The program uses speech recognition as a central teaching tool.
Speech recognition is usually tackled in one of two ways.
The owner of the board is running the group by using speech recognition software from her bed.
However, speech recognition (by a machine) is a very complex problem.
You an also use speech recognition software in homes and businesses.
A. Yes, a good speech recognition program can take a load off your mouse.
Similar speech recognition is also used in some areas to ask whether a collect call will be accepted.
Then again, even humans are not perfect speech recognition machines.
They point to speech recognition technology as the eventual ways to open the doors to such people.
"So if speech recognition were 100 percent accurate, it would be more efficient."