Additional examples are adjusted to the entries in an automated way - we cannot guarantee that they are correct.
But all of them help to make the biologists' case.
Much of my time is spent working in the field as a biologist.
Off to the side, the group of biologists kept to themselves.
Just a biologist trying to get things to work out.
Biologists do not know why it went so far north.
Then he decided to go back to school and become a biologist.
Today there are only about 35, according to state biologists.
State biologists say that may not be a good idea.
Later, biologists found that some were in quite different groups.
Biologists use them to tell how a population changes over time.
That could be because many leaders of the field are not biologists by training.
"You know what a biologist made in 1945 or 1946?"
He could stand and fight, but he'd have no more chance than the biologists.
That report from the biologist had come seven months before.
As biologists have long realized, the question makes little sense.
The biologist left the group she was talking to and came to join her.
Biologists began to see female sexual behavior with new eyes.
But biologists, by and large, did not believe the models.
Biologists are likely to argue over this point for some time.
Until recently biologists worked with the components they found in nature.
But biologists can guess the role of some major features.
The final test was carried out with just two biologists.
For some biologists, such questions no longer sound like science fiction.
It's just that I never found any biologists who were interested, either.
But what do professional biologists think about the basic issues?