Additional examples are adjusted to the entries in an automated way - we cannot guarantee that they are correct.
The students could also place themselves in any of these categories.
More than 130 people would seem to fall into one of those categories.
I can never understand why we must force others into our categories.
The works on view here fall into the second category.
Perhaps they should be in a different category, as well.
You try to be your own person, not to fall into a particular category.
In categories 3, 4 and 7 the situation looks better, but still not good.
In the following, we only present the results using four categories.
Almost every one of those in the second category has left the country.
More cases are likely to come within Category 2 however.
Let us now look at key points in each of these categories.
But what are those categories, and where do they come from?
They are given every year in a number of categories.
Too often people see the category and not the individual.
In other words, people can and do fall into more than one category.
The team ahead in a category is given a point.
At least three of the following categories should be present.
The number and name of categories changes nearly every year.
The number of categories was cut from 109 to 78.
Nearly half of them were in these two categories and what about the rest?
A year later, 76 percent were, and in 1995, 9 of 10 cases came under the top category.
Now Miles would find out how many of the second category he must move to the third.
"I will never put myself in the category of someone like that."
All in what we believe to be good growth categories.
About 20 percent of my students were in this category.