The nickname established itself in Byzantine texts and has become standard in modern historiography.

Despite its prominence and frequent mention in Byzantine texts, no full description of it is ever given.

It has very regular orthography, and differs only slightly from familiar printed editions of the Byzantine text.

It was one of the three Hort's arguments that the Byzantine text is the youngest.

James is also interested in the relationship between text and image, believing Byzantine texts to be of the same importance as the art they produced.

There are group A related to the Byzantine commentated text: 15, 53, 902, 1163, 1167.

In Luke 20 it has mixed Byzantine text with some relationship to the M groups.

It is commonly accepted as standard Byzantine text.

In Luke 20 it has mixed Byzantine text related to family Π200.

It means it has a strict the Byzantine text.