If Parliament had intended the word to mean 'releases other than for value', it could and had to say so.

Parliament intended that the client should have that month as a clear breathing space.

Nevertheless, the facts of the case may be such as to raise serious doubts whether Parliament intended its words to apply.

Ultimately, the majority concluded that Parliament intended for a person to have an active mind during the sexual activity in question.

Why in such a case should the courts blind themselves to a clear indication of what Parliament intended in using those words?

Parliament clearly intended to give stringent protection to such places.

The danger of the approach is that it allows the courts to intervene even where Parliament intended the tribunal's decision to be final.

I wonder how Parliament intends to deal with those.

We will do it together and your Parliament intends to play its full part in that respect.

If Parliament intends to do so, it must make its meaning crystal clear.