The US law is just another example of it, from the business side.

Other than the fact that it is against US law?

But then, my knowledge of US constitutional law is pretty basic.

This is probably a great big gray area that US law doesn't address.

However, the data can also be used for other purposes 'according to US law', as the agreement states.

We know that this is legal as per US law, everything else be damned.

The similar principle in US law is known as assumption of risk.

One likely consequence of this approach is that it will be more difficult to change US law in the future.

US law does not currently have a legislative standard for determining whether something is a "well-known mark."

This is because US law provides that no new evidence can be introduced after a certain stage.