The 4th Amendment gives people the right to be secure against unreasonable search.

Security of person would also be less comprehensive than section 8 rights against unreasonable search and seizure.

The less the element of choice, the greater the protection against searches and profiling.

They said the order violated their constitutional right against unreasonable search and seizure.

First, section 8 guarantees that everyone has the right to be secure against "unreasonable search and seizure."

However, because the home is the private property of the owner, homes have different protections against warrantless searches.

One of the amendments, I think the third, protects against illegal search and seizure.

In most cases, citizens are guaranteed protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Here, the fact that a federal guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure existed was crucial.

The employees have argued that the drug tests violate their constitutional rights against unreasonable searches.