The appeal argues that this factor does not instruct the jury on how to evaluate a defendant's criminal past.

Her appeal argued that applying the chemical weapons treaty to her violated the Tenth Amendment.

Meanwhile, the appeal argues that immigration laws do not exclude children from asking for asylum.

The appeal argues, oddly enough, that the court's compliance order violates the doctrine of separation of powers.

The woman's appeal, which was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that the order violated her constitutional right to privacy.

Riggs' appeal argued that the sentence was excessive because it exceeded sentencing guidelines for his crimes and previous convictions.

"The decision below undermines a national imperative to eliminate racial discrimination," the appeal argues.

A verdict in Arizona must be unanimous, and the man's appeal argued that he was constitutionally entitled to a specific verdict.

Ms. Faragher's appeal argues that, to the contrary, the supervisors abused their official authority, and the city should be deemed to have known about it.

The state's appeal argues that the decision erroneously created a constitutional "right to intimate human relationships for incarcerated felons" and would undermine discipline.