The authors provide some pretty definitive looking evidence that this is the case.

Many authors provide lists of summary points and future issues.

The authors of the new paper provide a second reason: lawsuits.

But the authors don't actually provide any examples of how that might happen.

The author conducted interviews with members, and provides analysis about certain practices.

He argues that the author did not provide enough proof for his argument.

And the author provides no sense of how the business process works.

There are so many characters that the author provides an index of who's who.

And if the author can provide an interesting point of view, all the better.

The author then provided a series of implications and suggestions for future research.