Many others, too, feel that Michigan's results properly balance women's reproductive freeedom against the need to avoid baby selling.

This is not baby selling; it's women providing a service, and we treat these agreements as payment for services.

How is the baby "selling" of 1965 different from adoption today?

The practice has created controversy because some critics call it "baby selling" and because it limits the children available to parents without means.

For Judge Parslow to say his decision is not giving effect to baby selling doesn't make it so.

They contend it violates New Jersey laws prohibiting baby selling.

In an attempt to quell charges of baby selling, the bill would have declared money given to a surrogate "compensation for her services" and not payment for the child.

To prevent baby selling, "private" adoptions, those that are not arranged through established agencies, are subject to special rules.

He also dismissed arguments that surrogate parenthood amounted to illegal baby selling.

This woman was involved in baby selling.