The case establishes that contributing to the cost of running a house does not, in itself, create a beneficial interest.

His case could establish limits on what doctors can do to help companies sell their drugs.

As such, the case may establish a precedent of unusual importance.

The most recent cases, in Zimbabwe, could establish that pattern, they say.

These cases, at least for a time, established the right of governments to regulate corporations.

The case established that radio (and later, television) stations had the same right to news reports as newspapers.

They argue that such cases establish the existence of discrimination.

Thus, the case established that a fundamental form cannot be registered as a design.

However the case was settled out of court and so did not establish a precedent.

But as it made its way through the state courts, the case established a new precedent.