Tendencies and elements in certain societies that seemed marginal before a war turn out to be much more significant.

I feel it about certain quaint and alien societies, especially about the Japanese.

From the moment a person enters a certain society, he no longer has freedom of choice and is completely subordinate to its influence.

Rather than discuss or promote certain individual society, club, association with vested interest while putting others down.

And I simply do not agree with those who either say overtly or believe that certain societies cannot be free.

Similarly anchoring is not confined to the life of certain specified societies.

They revealed themselves on many occasions in the past and even contributed to certain societies and their technologies.

We know that some past societies collapsed while others didn't: what made certain societies especially vulnerable?

Throughout our history as a species, it seems that certain societies reach a maximum density, if you will.

Durkheim was concerned with the question of how certain societies maintain internal stability and survive over time.