For the first time a court has drawn the line in the sand.

But in "a trickle of cases," he said, courts have drawn lines.

First, you can choose not to make any statement at all, in which case the court will draw no inferences from your action.

He said: "It is the case that all courts will draw upon and look at any documents.

The court can draw its own map if an alternative is not completed in 60 days.

What conclusion are you proposing that the court should draw from this?

The court drew an analogy with a footpath on a private property.

But the high court again drew a firm line between thought and action.

Unless the court drew a line, those state laws, along with dozens if not hundreds of death sentences, would fall.

In this case, the lines the court has drawn make no sense.