Different critics interpret what is actually happening in the novel differently.

His critics interpreted this as a sign of passivity and poor leadership.

Some critics have interpreted this as evidence that he finds the human body disgusting, but the opposite is true.

On this point, and on many others, her critics would interpret history quite differently.

Critics have similarly interpreted the film as an allegory of these social and regional concerns.

Some critics, however, interpreted this type of material as evidence that the album is unfocused.

In those countries, critics interpreted the film to be about the environment told in the form of Japanese mythology.

Some critics interpreted the film as an allegorical comment on the state of Japanese cinema in the mid-1970s.

While this interpretation is valid, other critics have interpreted the phrase "child of state" differently.

However, some critics have interpreted the poem in both biographical and psychoanalytic terms.