You mean to say that false opinion thinks what is not?

Do you perceive, then, that false opinion and speech have been discovered sooner than we expected?

"People believe they have the right of way on the road, but that is a false opinion," she said.

Then there is no such thing as false opinion?

And so you are satisfied that false opinion is heterodoxy, or the thought of something else?

Now, when a person has this knowledge, and is considering something which he sees or hears, may not false opinion arise in the following manner?

Then now we may admit the existence of false opinion in us?

How can the exchange of one knowledge for another ever become false opinion?

He will certainly not think that he has a false opinion?

Could any one, my friend, who began with false opinion ever expect to arrive even at a small portion of truth and to attain wisdom?