The reforms will shift the nation's patent system from a "first-to-invent" process to the more efficient international standard of a "first-to-file" system.

As a trade-off to gain this benefit, the U.S. proposes to shift to a first-to-file system.

Critics of the first-to-file system also contend it will create a "race to the mailbox," and result in sloppier, last-minute patent applications.

The first-to-file system, supporters contend, would inject much-needed certainty into the patent application process.

As an aside, I see that the current bill indeed includes a first-to-file system (which has evidently reinvigorated debate over this issue).

In observing changes taking place in a truly global economy, moving to a "first-to-file" system is clearly the better option for inventors and our economy.

The need for an inventor's notebook will diminish in the future as the United States is progressively implementing a first-to-file system.

Under the "first-to-file" system, the question of who deserves to own a patent is simplified, Leahy said.

During a Senate debate in March, Leahy said the first-to-file system simplifies and adds objectivity to the process.

The main issue is whether the United States will move from a first-to-invent system to a first-to-file system.