But for us hot reactors, the trick seems to be quieting the mind.

Provisions remain in force for existing reactors but new ones would not be covered.

The estimated capital costs are two-thirds less than those for nuclear reactors.

His nonprofit group, which is based in Washington, has been seeking better protection for reactors since the mid-1980's.

Under international agreement, it is blended down to the level appropriate for reactors.

In the last decade there were no orders for new nuclear reactors.

And there appears to be bipartisan support for new reactors.

The annual fee for nuclear reactors will nearly double, to $950,000 from $550,000, an increase that may be reflected in energy costs.

An example may include control systems for ordinary nuclear reactors.

Many safety designs for reactors around the world are based on these tests.