There is nothing wrong with a reviewer's making a violent ideological attack on a book.

Although he did little work in this post, it shielded him from ideological attack.

The hypocracy of an ideological attack on the public sector in times like this is incredible.

He considered religion to be political by nature and the primary target of ideological attacks.

He also seeks to head off an ideological attack.

Not that the "silent majority" ideological attacks undid the networks.

It is an ideological attack on State provision of care.

As Seamus says all this is cover for an ideological attack on the State.

The higher education white paper is an ideological attack on vulnerable students.

I am forced to conclude that the changes to higher education are an ideological attack on vulnerable students.