By trying to carry an inductive argument backward in time based on a fact known only by Thursday the prisoner may be making an error.

An inductive argument, on the other hand, asserts that the truth of the conclusion is otherwise supported by the premises.

This property plays a key role in many proofs regarding "G" since it allows to use inductive arguments on the length of a word.

It is based on an inductive argument.

An inductive argument shows how the m can be constructed.

The principle of induction would certainly be justified if inductive arguments also possessed it.

Then, letting the box run into its next number, he resumed his inductive argument.

Instead, the conclusion of an inductive argument follows with some degree of probability.

Relatedly, the conclusion of an inductive argument contains more information than is already contained in the premises.

This can be easily seen with an inductive argument.