However, the argument can be made that it is equally possible to interpret those passages from the perspective of limited atonement.

Unlimited atonement has a number of important points in common with traditional formulations of limited atonement.

This stands in contrast to the limited atonement of Calvinism, which asserts that Christ only died for those God chooses to be saved.

R. C. Sproul believes there is confusion about what the doctrine of limited atonement actually teaches.

He is best known for having authored a detailed refutation of "the false doctrine of limited atonement," and several other theological treatises.

Calvinism resolves it by positing a doctrine of limited atonement, which claims that God's love is restricted.

Richard Baxter rejected the idea of a limited atonement in favor of a universal atonement.

His counselors were also concerned that he was wavering on his belief in the doctrine of limited atonement.

Campbell clearly disagreed with the Westminster Confession of Faith's view of a limited atonement, and he was removed from the ministry.

Crocius and Martinius were in the small group of Dort delegates who rejected limited atonement.