The election would not to be under the supervision of any national court or international monitors.

They should be taken to national and international court.

The election was not under any national court or international supervision.

Following the decision of the national court a campaign in defense of the house was started.

It is possible and frequent to have a national court applying foreign law.

No, it should not be a central reference point of national courts.

The citizens of church states cannot defend their rights before national courts.

In the report, you could get the impression that national courts have the final word.

Such claims have therefore to be brought before the national courts.

No national constitutional court can set itself up as ruling over Community law.