The networks argue that it isn't always possible to present two films on every controversial issue.

The networks argued that audiences would never accept a canned show in a live medium.

The networks have argued that the rules unfairly restrict their business and need to be changed.

But the networks argue that they no longer dominate broadcasting.

The networks have long argued - and a federal appeals court has agreed - that they cannot monitor their users.

The networks had argued that the old restrictions were outdated.

The networks argue that the new rules do not increase their access to the programming market and in fact decrease it.

With a far less dominant share of the market now, the networks have been arguing for two years that the rules should be dropped.

As such, the networks have argued that the old restrictions are outdated.

The networks argue that such a drastic change in viewing habits is simply not plausible.