Is conservation biology an objective science when biologists advocate for an inherent value in nature?

Well, yes, if literary awards are supposed to be an objective science, but I'm not sure that I entirely buy it.

The author points to what he sees as the acceptance of objective science in practice but not in spirit.

He was a man of experimental psychology, objective science, but also philosophical science.

What he means by his title is that economics is no timeless, objective science.

He further says that his results "suggest that social work exists outside the critical tradition of objective science."

The empirical basis of objective science has thus nothing 'absolute' about it.

What many will also insist on though is the importance of studying humanity at a higher level than the objective sciences can allow.

To him the most important aspects of the psyche lay beyond objective science, at least in his time.

Need more than objective science for that I'm afraid.