Whether in the event owners would have consented is quite another question.

I'm afraid the owner wouldn't consent to sell.

If the vehicle is taken with the owner's knowledge, the owner has consented.

That may occur even though the owner has permitted or consented to the property being taken.

The plaintiff relied on Lawrence to show that an appropriation could occur, even if the owner consented.

It has to be threatened by development or neglect, and the owner must consent to its being listed.

The owner of property can consent to someone destroying or damaging that property.

Within the Theft Act there is an appropriation even though the owner consented to it.

A property facing Irvington's Main Street was considered next but the owners would not consent.

For instance, the owner of the property in question may consent to the search.