In it I saw tales of past battles and matings.

But this book does not really integrate those past battles with the current ones, which is unfortunate.

She still seemed to take that past battle as a personal affront.

I speak not of Vietnam, or any other past battles.

The fight could make past battles over a 10-cent increase in the price of a token seem like a high-school debate.

After this, there is a Gathering, at which the readers hear stories of past battles.

Yes, it is different from our past battles with defined countries as enemies, so maybe we have to redefine war.

That these representations were accounts of real past battles I believed.

But Republicans who have been through past battles over tax laws scoff at such ideas.

The legacy, she wondered, of some past battle or brawl?