To show negligence, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the "standard of care" has been breached by the doctor in question.

To prove such claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate elements similar to those of contractual relationships stated aforementioned.

Under the legal doctrine of standing, the Federal courts generally require a plaintiff to demonstrate some injury attributable to the challenged action.

The Court said the employer must show the necessity of such a requirement once the plaintiff demonstrated that it disproportionately hurt blacks.

However, the plaintiff must demonstrate that it made a good faith effort to service the registered agent before it may serve the Secretary of State.

Judge Patel granted the preliminary injunction, on the grounds that the plaintiffs demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success.

Some early cases required plaintiffs to demonstrate that their cause of action could withstand a motion to dismiss.

The plaintiff must further demonstrate that the person who made the remarks committed a wrongful act.

The judge said the plaintiff had never demonstrated that he could manufacture and market the system he invented in the early 1960's.

For a decision to violate the law, a plaintiff must demonstrate that politics or concerns with 'general standards of decency' affected the evaluation.