The plaintiff suffered severe head injuries as a result.

Suppose a plaintiff suffers loss as a result of an illegal administrative decision.

So the job of the courts in applying the law is to decide whether a plaintiff suffers from such a limitation.

She's here because the plaintiffs are suffering and they want someone to pay for their loss, right or wrong.

Did the plaintiffs suffer an injury in fact sufficient to establish standing?

A trial court judge bought that argument and dismissed the case last year, saying the plaintiffs suffered no legal harm.

The plaintiff suffered from deteriorating eyesight and became almost blind.

The plaintiff suffered injuries to his left leg as a result of the defendant's negligence.

The plaintiff would have suffered the injuries even if he had been wearing a belt.

Another important element would be how much damage, in millions or billions of dollars, the plaintiffs suffered.