The prosecutor must prove each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

Instead, prosecutors must prove that each defendant intended to take part in a crime and did something to help make it happen.

In upholding that decision, the appeals court said prosecutors could not prove their case.

The law requires that prosecutors prove their cases beyond a reasonable doubt.

For a successful case, prosecutors must prove an intention to commit fraud.

They also, for the first time, require prosecutors to prove that offenders are public safety risks.

The panel of judges ruled, however, that prosecutors had not proven their case.

Rather, the prosecutors must prove the absence of justification beyond a reasonable doubt.

We make prosecutors prove that they committed the crimes using forensic and other evidence.

The prosecutor must prove that the person charged actually uses or threatens some violence.