According to Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family K in Luke 10.

According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family K in Luke 10, in Luke 1 it has a mixture of Byzantine textual families, in Luke 20 no profile was made because the manuscript is defective.

According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family K in Luke 1 and Luke 20, but no profile was made for Luke 10.

According to the Claremont Profile Method it has a mixture of the Byzantine families in Luke 1 and represents the textual family K in Luke 20.

According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family K in Luke 10.

According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family K and creates cluster 202.

Aland placed it with some hesitation in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family K in Luke 1.

According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family K in Luke 1, in Luke 20 it has a mixture of the Byzantine text-families.