Each side cites the Constitution to back its claim.

But the outlines of the problem are already plain, and each side cites international precedents to make its case.

The panels issued two long reports that both sides cite as supporting their positions.

The simple answer is that no one knows for sure, which is why both sides can reasonably cite the same cases without fear of embarrassment.

Both sides cited economic issues (including funding for additional pay raises) as a primary reason.

Both sides have cited data from soil and water samples to support their arguments.

The two sides cited competing studies to bolster their arguments.

Each side cites experts to back and rebut the contention that B-12 is a drug.

Both sides have cited the sensitivity of the topic in refusing to speak about the discussions.

Each side cited different agreements that each said it had reached with the city to bolster its position.