With copyright there are a lot of ideas that you can't protect.

People seem to find it relatively easy to understand the term/patent', but have difficulty with 'copyright'.

Generally, the word copy goes with copyright and not patent.

That might be true, the Register agreed, but what did it have to do with copyright?

Anyone who has a problem with copyright should just ask me about it, and we'll work it out.

With copyright on religious works it is not always clear who the rights' holder is.

All works after 1923 with renewed copyright are presumably still protected.

Sure, but that has nothing to do with copyright, which was my point.

After all, the same package deals with patents and copyright.

What does a patent infringement case have to do with copyright?