The bill would require the state to pick up the costs.

There is no law requiring the state to do so.

Would have required the state to pay the local share of Medicaid costs.

But it would also require the state to match contributions up to the first $2,500.

The act requires states to provide "highly qualified" teachers to all students.

But it would not require the state to pay for appeals in Federal courts.

The bill would also require the state to develop a comprehensive plan for future growth in areas near the shore.

There's nothing in the Constitution that requires the state to protect the environment, is there?

It also required the state to have a technically superior form of organization.

This instrument makes a very good complement to our policy for requiring other states to support human rights.

Under current law, the state is not required to come up with the money.

At that point, the state would be required to provide its share of the money.

All states will be required to release such data next year under the new federal education law.

The bill would require the state to pick up the costs.

The state is not required to ever actually issue the bonds.

The state is required to cover much of their costs, along with the Federal and local governments.

There is no law requiring the state to do so.

Considered as a civil rights law, states are not required to participate.

Would have required the state to pay the local share of Medicaid costs.

Both the city and the state should now be required to pony up.